Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Kayla Gore, et al v. William Lee, et al
as 23-5669
Plaintiff / Appellant: KAYLA GORE, L.G., K.N. and others
Defendant / Appellee: WILLIAM BYRON LEE, In his official capacity as Governor of the State of Tennessee and LISA PIERCEY, In her official capacity as Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Health
Fiscus v. Piercey et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00686
Plaintiff: Michelle Fiscus
Defendant: Lisa Piercey and Tim Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bristol Regional Women's Cente, et al v. Herbert Slatery, III, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-6267
Plaintiff / Appellee: KNOXVILLE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF TENNESSEE AND NORTH MISSISSIPPI, formerly known as Planned Parenthood of Middle and East Tennessee, DR. KIMBERLY LOONEY and others
Defendant: DR. RENEE SAUNDERS and WILLIAM BYRON LEE
Defendant / Appellant: AMY P. WEIRICH, District Attorney General of Shelby County, GLENN R. FUNK, District Attorney General of Nashville, HERBERT H. SLATERY, III, Attorney General of Tennessee and others
Planned Parenthood of Tennessee and North Mississippi et al v. Slatery et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00740
Plaintiff: FemHealth USA, Inc., Knoxville Center for Reproductive Health, Planned Parenthood of Tennessee and North Mississippi and others
Defendant: Rene Saunders, Glenn Funk, Tom P. Thompson, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Memphis Ctr for Repro Health, et al v. Herbert Slatery, III, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-5969
Plaintiff / Appellee: PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF TENNESSEE AND NORTH MISSISSIPPI, on behalf of itself, its physicians and staff, and its patients, KNOXVILLE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, on behalf of itself, its physicians and staff, and its patients, DR. KIMBERLY LOONEY, on behalf of herself and her patients and others
Defendant / Appellant: LISA PIERCEY, M.D., Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Health, in her official capacity, GLENN R. FUNK, District Attorney General of Davidson County, Tennessee, in his official capacity, CHARME P. ALLEN, District Attorney General of Knox County, Tennessee, in her official capacity and others
Memphis Center for Reproductive Health et al v. Slatery et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00501
Plaintiff: FemHealth USA, Inc., Knoxville Center for Reproductive Health, Dr. Kimberly Looney and others
Defendant: Rene Saunders, Honorable Amy P. Weirich, Glenn Funk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams & Boyle, P.C., et al v. Herbert Slatery, III, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-5408
Plaintiff / Appellee: ADAMS & BOYLE, P.C., on behalf of itself and its patients, DR. KIMBERLY LOONEY, PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREATER MEMPHIS REGION and others
Defendant / Appellant: AMY P. WEIRICH, District Attorney General of Shelby County, WILLIAM BYRON LEE, Governor, GLENN R. FUNK, District Attorney General of Nashville and others
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, ETHICS AND RELIGIOUS LIBERTY COMMISSION OF THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION and others
Gore et al v. Lee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00328
Plaintiff: Kayla Gore, K.N., L.G. and others
Defendant: William Byron Lee and Lisa Piercey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jeffery Douglas v. Danielle Jones, et al
as 13-6244
Plaintiff - Appellant: JEFFERY G. DOUGLAS
Defendant - Appellee: DANIELLE JONES, STATE OF TENNESSEE, DONALD H. ALLEN and others
Douglas v. Jones et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01276
Plaintiff: Jeffery G. Douglas
Defendant: Danielle Jones , State of Tennessee , Donald H. Allen and others
Miscellaneou: Kathy Blount
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?