Cases 1 - 10 of 18
LISTER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01784
Plaintiff:
RONNIE LISTER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, OFFICER REGINALD GRAHAM and JOHN DOES 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
G.E. v. THE DIOCESES OF ALLENTOWN et al
as 2:2022cv04167
Plaintiff:
G.E.
Defendant:
THE DIOCESES OF ALLENTOWN, ALLENTOWN CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL, DENNIS CSENSITS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
G.E. v. THE DIOCESE OF ALLENTOWN et al
as 5:2022cv04167
Plaintiff:
G.E.
Defendant:
THE DIOCESE OF ALLENTOWN, ALLENTOWN CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL, DENNIS CSENSITS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03660
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
LISTER v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2018cv03105
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
NICOLE MARIE LISTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
BRAME v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2016cv01031
Plaintiff:
CHESTER BRAME
Defendant:
BRIAN REYNOLDS, JEFFREY WALKER, PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LISTER v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 2:2015cv04216
Plaintiff:
VERONICA LISTER
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DELVILA et al v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2015cv02521
Plaintiff:
JUAN DELVILA , JUAN SOLER , TONY MASON and others
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, CHRISTOPHER HULMES, JAMES REILLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CRUZ et al v. HULMES et al
as 2:2015cv02234
Plaintiff:
JOEL CRUZ , ADALERTO MORALES RODRIGUEZ and JOSHUA MORALES
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER HULMES, JAMES REILLY, PATRICK BANNING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
