Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Roger Shekar v. James Duff, et al
as 22-5211
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roger Shekar
Defendant / Appellee:
James Duff, Anthony Scirica, Rebecca Pallmeyer and others
SHEKAR v. DUFF et al
as 1:2022cv02123
Defendant:
STEVE GILMAN, JOAQUIN ARCHIVALDO GUZMAN, JAMES DUFF and others
Plaintiff:
ROGER SHEKAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMSPORT REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER et al v. AZAR
as 1:2018cv00832
Plaintiff:
SMDC MEDICAL CENTER ESSENTIA HEALTH DULUTH, PALOMAR MEDICAL CENTER, SOLDIERS & SAILORS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
ALEX AZAR and ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
ENLOE MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BURWELL
as 1:2015cv01524
Plaintiff:
ENLOE MEDICAL CENTER , BARTON HEALTHCARE SYSTEM , MARTIN LUTHER HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
SYLVIA M. BURWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
SOLDIERS & SAILORS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al v. BURWELL
as 1:2015cv01244
Plaintiff:
SOLDIERS & SAILORS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL , WILLIAMSPORT REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER , INNOVIS HEALTH, LLC ESSENTIA HEALTH FARGO and others
Defendant:
SYLVIA M. BURWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Lawrence Livermore Ntnl Secur v. NLRB
as 11-1301
Petitioner:
Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
FRANKLIN BENEVOLENT CORPORATION et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2010cv01714
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN BENEVOLENT CORPORATION , DESERT HEALTHCARE DISTRICT , NORTHBAY MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ALAMEDA COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2009cv01465
Plaintiff:
ALAMEDA COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER, BARTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION FOR HEALTH and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2651 Medical Care Recovery
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
