Cases 1 - 9 of 9
ESTATE OF ADAN YOMER ROLDAN LLANOS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv03989
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF ADAN YOMER ROLDAN LLANOS and Nicole Diaz
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS, COMMISSIONER BLANCHE CARNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
LLANOS-FALERO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2022cv01222
Plaintiff:
Aurelio Llanos-Falero
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
LLANOS-FALERO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv03051
Plaintiff:
AURELIO LLANOS-FALERO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DANZIGER & DE LLANO, LLP v. MORGAN VERKAMP, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv02082
Plaintiff:
DANZIGER & DE LLANO, LLP
Defendant:
MORGAN VERKAMP, LLC , FREDERICK M. MORGAN , JR and JENNIFER VERKAMP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv01898
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LLANOS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv55979
Plaintiff:
REINALDO LLANOS, JR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
LLANOS v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2010cv42636
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL LLANOS
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
LLANOS v. AMERICAN EXPORT LINES INC.
as 2:2010cv42635
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL LLANOS
Defendant:
AMERICAN EXPORT LINES INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
LLANO v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW et al
as 2:2009cv02981
Petitioner:
RAFAEL ADOLFO LLANO
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR UNITED STATES and WARDEN-S.C.I. HOUTZDALE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
