Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Walton v. Tilton et al
as 1:2010cv00330
Plaintiff:
Charles Walton
Defendant:
James E. Tilton, James D. Hartley, Lonnie Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Allen Lepore v. Lonnie Watson
as 2:2008cv05779
:
Respondent:
Lonnie Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tatmon v. Hartley et al
as 1:2008cv00695
Plaintiff:
Perry L. Tatmon
Defendant:
James D. Hartley, Lonnie Watson, Sandra R. Pennywell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fordjour v. Hartley et al
as 1:2007cv01830
Plaintiff:
Charles Fordjour
Defendant:
James Hartley, Lonnie Watson, Linda Ochoa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fordjour v. Director of CDCR et al
as 1:2007cv01768
Plaintiff:
Charles Fordjour
Defendant:
Director of CDCR, James Hartley, Lonnie Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joshua v. Ariaza et al
as 1:2007cv01636
Plaintiff:
Rory Joshua
Defendant:
E. Ariaza, Lonnie Watson and Alfaro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Allen Lepore v. Lonnie Watson
as 2:2007cv06637
Petitioner:
Joseph Allen Lepore
Respondent:
Lonnie Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benjamin McAllister v. Lonnie Watson
as 2:2007cv05863
Plaintiff:
Benjamin L McAllister
Defendant:
Lonnie Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alfonso Cano v. Lonnie Watson
as 2:2007cv05776
Petitioner:
Alfonso Cano
Respondent:
Lonnie Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Player v. Corcoran State Prison et al
as 5:2007cv00439
Plaintiff:
Lavell Player
Defendant:
Corcoran State Prison, Adams, B. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
