Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Lori Lapin Jones PLLC v. Laila's, Inc.
as 0:2019mc00047
Plaintiff: Lori Lapin Jones PLLC
Debtor In Possession: Crafts Retail Holding Corp., et al.
Defendant: Laila's, Inc.
In re: Asian Expandere, Inc.
as 19-1620
Appellee: Providence Ridge Associates, LP and Lori Lapin Jones
Debtor: In re: Asian Expandere, Inc.
Appellant: Zhan W. Cao and J.C. Investor, LLC
Velappan Veeraswamy
as 19-993
Trustee: Lori Lapin Jones, as Chapter 7 Trustee of the Estate of Velappan Veeraswamy
Appellant: Karen Veeraswamy
Not Yet Classified: Velappan Veeraswamy
Debtor: In re: Velappan Veeraswamy
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv02129
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv02137
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv07568
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04043
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv05165
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
In Re: Chana Taub
as 12-1878
Petitioner: Chana Taub
Respondent: Ronald J Friedman, Leo Fox and Lori Lapin Jones
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02247
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?