Cases 71 - 80 of 216
Isaacson v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2014cv04592
Petitioner:
Corey Isaacson
Respondent:
State of Minnesota , Becky Dooly , Lori Swanson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chuck Thomas Considine v. Steve Hammer, et al
as 14-3221
Petitioner - Appellant:
Chuck Thomas Considine
Respondent - Appellee:
Steve Hammer and Lori Swanson, Attorney General of the State of Minnesota
Juarez v. Hammer et al
as 0:2014cv04048
Petitioner:
Jose Santoya Juarez
Respondent:
Steve Hammer and Lori Swanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Solorzano-O'Brien v. Grandlienard et al
as 0:2014cv03836
Petitioner:
Tarun Solorzano-O'Brien
Respondent:
Kent Grandlienard and Lori Swanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sterling v. Hennepin County et al
as 0:2014cv03349
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee Sterling
Defendant:
Hennepin County, Minnesota, State of, Lori Swanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorenson v. Office of the Minnesota Attorney General et al
as 0:2014cv02929
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Office of the Minnesota Attorney General, Lori Swanson, Aaron Winters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danforth v. Swanson et al
as 0:2014cv00896
Plaintiff:
Stephen Danforth
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Michael Freeman, Thomas Alberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Considine v. Hammer et al
as 0:2013cv03225
Petitioner:
Chuck Thomas Considine
Respondent:
Steve Hammer and Lori Swanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Suchan et al v. Jesson et al
as 0:2013cv03114
Plaintiff:
Bryce Suchan, Matthew Reece, Joseph D Thornblad and others
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson and Lori Swanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reece et al v. Jesson et al
as 0:2013cv03125
Plaintiff:
Matthew Reece, Joseph D. Thornblad, Shawn Curry-Rakesh and others
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson and Lori Swanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
