Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Char v. Tresch, et al.
as 24-868
Plaintiff:
MARK ALAN CHAR
Defendant:
MAURA TRESCH, RICHARD BANNER, DEANE HATAKEYAMA and others
Char v. Tresch et al
as 1:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Char
Defendant:
Maura Tresch, Richard Banner, Deane Hatakeyama and others
Interested Party:
Litigation Coordinator, State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Todd v. Park City 3 & 4 Apartments, In
as 21-2758
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Maxine A. Todd
Defendant / Appellee:
Park City 3 & 4 Apartments, Inc., Administrator Emily Stone, Executor of Diane Stone's Estate, MD Lohia Deep and others
Defendant:
New York City Health and Hospital Corporation
Slavick v. Colotario et al
as 1:2018cv00290
Plaintiff:
Chris Slavick
Defendant:
Michael Souza, An Uedoi, Richard Lopez and others
Interested Party:
Shelley Nobriga, Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry Lagmay v. Shelley Nobriga, et al
as 17-16109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY LAGMAY
Defendant - Appellee:
SHELLEY NOBRIGA, NOLAN P. ESPINDA, Warden, FRANCIS SEQUEIRA and others
Tia v. CCA, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00043
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
CCA, Inc., USDC Honolulu All Officials, HCF Grievance Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lagmay v. Nobriga, et al
as 1:2016cv00408
Plaintiff:
Henry Lagmay
Defendant:
Shelly Nobriga, Nolan Espinda, Francis Sequeira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SACKO v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv06892
Plaintiff:
BRENDA SACKO
Defendant:
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, INC. , TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. , TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
