Cases 1 - 10 of 21
People's Capital and Leasing Corp. v. Schaefer, Jr. et al
as 2:2019cv14058
Plaintiff:
People's Capital and Leasing Corp.
Defendant:
Louis E. Schaefer, Jr. and Sea Tech Industries, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv03130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv03143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Robert Brand v. Superior Offshore Intl, Inc., et al
as 11-20494
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHARLES OGNAR
Defendant - Appellee:
MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER & SMITH INC, JP MORGAN SECURITIES INC, LOUIS E. SCHAEFER and others
Movant - Appellant:
DON J. GORDON
Case name not on file
as 4:2009cv02139
Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Louis Schaefer, Jr., et al v. Superior Offshore Internationa, et al
as 09-20213
Debtor - (null):
In the Matter of: SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC
Appellant:
LOUIS E SCHAEFER, JR. and SCHAEFER HOLDINGS LP
Appellee:
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC and OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS OF SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00688
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Schaefer Holdings, LP et al
as 4:2009mc00091
Appellant:
Schaefer Holdings, LP and Louis E Schaefer, Jr.
Schaefer, et al v. Superior Offshr Intl
as 09-6
Debtor - (null):
In re: SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC
Petitioner:
LOUIS E SCHAEFER, JR. and SCHAEFER HOLDINGS LP
Respondent:
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC and OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS OF SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00338
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
