Cases
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01174
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Koll et al v. Mukasey et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2008cv61278
Plaintiff: Vladimir Koll and Lyudmila Kuleva
Defendant: MIchael B. Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Louise Germain and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Civil Rights None
Nguyen v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services et al
as 3:2007cv01065
Petitioner: Cuong Viet Nguyen
Respondent: U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services and Louise Germain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
DAOUST v. KESLER et al
as 3:2007cv00495
Plaintiff: ROBERT DAOUST
Defendant: PETER D KESLER, LOUISE GERMAINE, EMILIO GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
KARAMAN v. KEISLER et al
as 5:2007cv00273
Plaintiff: MOHAMMED RASHID KARAMAN
Defendant: PETER D KEISLER, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
IN THE MATTER OF CORAZON RAMOS MILLER V KEISLER ET AL
as 5:2007cv00247
Petitioner: IN THE MATTER OF CORAZON RAMOS MILLER
Defendant: PETER D KEISLER, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T GONZALEZ and others
Galietta v. Mueller et al
as 3:2007cv00521
Plaintiff: Dany Galietta
Defendant: Robert S. Mueller, Donald Neufeld, Louise Germain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00208
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MOHAMED v. CHERTOFF et al
as 5:2007cv00068
Plaintiff: AHMED A MOHAMED
Defendant: MICHAEL CHERTOFF, LOUISE GERMAINE and EMILIO GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?