Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Louisiana Health Services and Indemnity Company et al v. Ranbaxy, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv10274
Defendant:
Ranbaxy, USA, Inc., Ranbaxy Laboratories, LTD, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
HMO Louisiana, Inc. and Louisiana Health Services and Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
In Re: Ranbaxy Generic Drug Application Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2019md02878
In Re:
Ranbaxy Generic Drug Application Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
Meijer, Inc., Meijer Distribution, Inc., Cesar Castillo, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited, Ranbaxy, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers Health and Welfare Fund of Northern Pennsylvania and Louisiana Health Services and Indemnity Company d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana
Respondent:
Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc.
Interested Party:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals L.P.
Not Classified By Court:
Winifred Weitsen
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana et al v. Insys Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv12538
Defendant:
John Does 1-100 and Insys Therapeutics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana and HMO Louisiana, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Williams v. United States Treasury Department et al
as 1:2015cv13744
Plaintiff:
Garland E. Williams
Defendant:
United States Treasury Department, State Of Louisiana 22nd Judicial Court District, State Of Kansas 3 rd Judicial Shawnee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Louisiana Health Service and Indemnity Company v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. et al
as 1:2015cv13461
Plaintiff:
Louisiana Health Service and Indeminty Company
Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. , Novartis AG and Novartis Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
CARITEN INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. ASTRAZENECA AB et al
as 1:2014cv13873
Plaintiff:
CARITEN INSURANCE COMPANY , EMPHESYS INSURANCE COMPANY , HUMANA BENEFIT PLAN OF ILLINOIS, INC. and others
Defendant:
Astrazeneca AB , Aktiebolaget Hassle , Astrazeneca LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In Re: Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2012md02409
Plaintiff:
International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers Local 595 Health And Welfare Fund, All Plaintiffs, New York Hotel Trades Council and Hotel Assoc. of New York City, Inc. Health Benefits Fund and others
Interested Party:
CaremarkPCS Health, LLC, Value Drug Company, McKesson Corporation and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
A.F. of L. - A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, ARCADIAN HEALTH PLAN OF LOUISIANA, INC., CARITEN INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Intervenor:
Express Scripts, Inc., Christopher Wirth, Edward Breivik and others
Defendant:
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc., Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals, Inc., TEVA USA, INC. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation
Petitioner:
Mr. TIMOTHY C. HESTER
In Re:
Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust Litigation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
United States of America v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv10896
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of Arkansas, State of California and others
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Depuy, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Louisiana Health Service Indemnity Company v. Astellas Pharma US, Inc.
as 1:2011cv12326
Plaintiff:
Louisiana Health Service Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Astellas Pharma US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System v. Dickerson et al
as 1:2011cv11294
Plaintiff:
Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System
Defendant:
Gary E Dickerson , Richard A Aurelio , Robert W Dutton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
