Cases 1 - 9 of 9
In re: Lamictal Direct Purchas, et al, et al
as 19-1655
Defendant / Appellant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, DBA SmithKline Beecham Corp, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD and TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROCHESTER DRUG COOPERATIVE INC, KING DRUG CO OF FLORENCE INC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO INC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017mc00164
Plaintiff:
LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. , KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC. and ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC.
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. and TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS
Thirdparty_defendant:
NORTHSTAR RX LLC
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Type:
Other Statutes
King Drug Co of Florence Inc, et al v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation, et al
as 14-1243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KING DRUG CO OF FLORENCE INC and LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO INC
Defendant - Appellee:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD and TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS
In Re: Hypodermic Product
as 13-2378
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AMERICAN SALES CO INC, SAJ DISTRIBUTORS, LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO INC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MEDSTAR HEALTH INC and MEDSTAR GEORGETOWN MEDICAL CENTER INC
Defendant - Appellee:
BECTON DICKINSON CO
LA Whsle Drug Co Inc, et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corp, et al
as 12-4584
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO INC and KING DRUG CO OF FLORENCE INC
Defendant - Appellee:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP, TEVA PHARM IND LTD and TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS
LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv00995
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly SmithKline Beecham Corp. d/b/a/ GlaxoSmithKline and others
Interested Party:
MEIJER INC.
Amicus Curiae:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Lead Plaintiff:
KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC., LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. and ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC.
Not Yet Classified:
MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, INC., MORRIS & DICKSON CO., L.L.C., FWK HOLDINGS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
HIP HEALTH PLAN OF F, et al v. SCHERING-PLOUGH, et al
as 2:2001cv01652
Plaintiff:
HIP HEALTH PLAN OF FLORIDA, INC. , Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs and Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs
Consol_plaintiff:
AMY REICHERT , GREAT LAKES HEALTH PLAN, INC. , ROSEEN and others
Pecial_master:
STEPHEN M. ORLOFSKY
Defendant:
SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 3:2009cv04050
Plaintiff:
LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC., BURLINGTON DRUG CO., INC. and MIAMI-LUKEN, INC.
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK SHARP & DOHME PHARMACEUTICALS SRL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
OWENS v. PFIZER, INC., et al
as 2:2002cv01390
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM OWENS , DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS, DIRECT PURCHASER NON-CLASS, AND END-PAYOR PLAINTIFFS , CVS PHARMACY, INC. and others
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC. and WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY
Pecial_master:
PAUL R. RICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
