Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Sorrow v. Linthicum
as 21-40897
Defendant / Appellee:
Lannette Linthicum, Medical Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Ben Raimer and others
Appellant:
Loyd Landon Sorrow
Sorrow v. USA
as 21-40475
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Loyd Landon Sorrow
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Attorney General and United States of America
Wilkins v. Linthicum
as 21-40414
Defendant / Appellee:
Rodney Burrow, John Burruss, University of Texas Medical Branch Correctional Managed Care and others
Appellant:
Justin Wilkins, Jerry N. Loer, Jr., Julian Dominguez and others
Sorrow v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2020cv00169
Plaintiff:
Loyd Landon Sorrow
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sorrow v. State of Texas
as 4:2019cv01133
Plaintiff:
Loyd Landon Sorrow
Defendant:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Loyd Sorrow v. Executive Director TDCJ, et al
as 17-20015
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOYD LANDON SORROW, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH - C T TERRELL UNIT and others
Sorrow v. State Of Texas et al
as 4:2016cv02530
Plaintiff:
Loyd Landon Sorrow
Defendant:
State Of Texas, University Of Texas Medical Branch, Erin Alison Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorrow v. Executive Director TDCJ et al
as 4:2016cv02493
Plaintiff:
Loyd Landon Sorrow
Defendant:
Executive Director TDCJ, University of Texas Medical Branch, University of Texas Medical Branch-CJ Terrell Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorrow v. Stephens
as 4:2014cv03520
Petitioner:
Loyd Landon Sorrow
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sorrow v. Quarterman
as 08-20733
Petitioner - Appellant:
LOYD LANDON SORROW
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
