Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Morales II et al v. Samararatne
as 8:2024mc00010
Plaintiff:
Kurt Morales II, Brandon Callier and Lucas Horton
Respondent:
Vijay Samararatne
Horton v. Multiplan Inc
as 3:2023cv02098
Plaintiff:
Lucas Horton
Defendant:
Multiplan Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Morales et al v. Forte Data Systems, Inc.
as 2:2023mc00208
Respondent:
Forte Data Systems, Inc.
Petitioner:
Kurt Morales, II, Brandon Callier and Lucas Horton
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Morales, et al., v. Sunpath Ltd., et al.,
as 2:2023mc00111
Plaintiff:
Kurt Morales II, Brandon Callier and Lucas Horton
Defendant:
Sunpath Ltd.
Respondent:
National Car Cure LLC
In Re: ROI Network, LLC
as 3:2022mc00093
Respondent:
ROI Network, LLC doing business as Auto Defender and ROI Network, LLC a Connecticut limited liability company doing business as Auto Defender
Petitioner:
Kurt Morales, II, Brandon Callier and Lucas Horton
Horton v. Rank Media USA LLC
as 3:2022cv02476
Plaintiff:
Lucas Horton
Defendant:
Rank Media USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Horton v. 360 Digital Media LLC
as 3:2022cv02475
Plaintiff:
Lucas Horton
Defendant:
360 Digital Media LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Horton v. Advantage One Brokers Corp
as 3:2022cv02474
Plaintiff:
Lucas Horton
Defendant:
Advantage One Brokers Corp
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Horton v. Trinity Resort Services
as 3:2022cv02219
Plaintiff:
Lucas Horton
Defendant:
Trinity Resort Services
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Horton v. Tarrant County Hospital District
as 3:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
Lucas Horton
Defendant:
Tarrant County Hospital District doing business as JPS Health Network
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
