Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Luis Jimenez Gonzales v. Barbas et al
as 2:2022cv07493
Plaintiff:
Luis Jimenez Gonzales, Jr.
Defendant:
Barbas, Bill Brown, Espinoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luis Jimenez Gonzales v. State of California
as 2:2022cv04793
Plaintiff:
Luis Jimenez Gonzales, Jr.
Defendant:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luis Jimenez Gonzales v. Brian Hill
as 2:2022cv03914
Plaintiff:
Luis Jimenez Gonzales, Jr.
Defendant:
Brian Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Gonzales Jimenez
as 3:2020cv00058
Defendant:
Sergio Gonzales Jimenez
Plaintiff:
Luis Jimenez Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzales v. St. Charles Hospital Redmond et al
as 6:2020cv00007
Defendant:
Deputy David Pool, Sheriff Shane Nelson, St. Charles Hospital Redmond and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Jimenez Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzales v. Bi-Mart Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv00008
Defendant:
Bi-Mart Corporation, Barry Bartholemew, Christopher Franco and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Jimenez Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzales v. Brown et al
as 1:2013cv01206
Defendant:
Tom Adams, Mel Brown, City of Madras and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Jimenez Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Myers et al
as 2:2012cv00105
Defendant:
C/O B. Closson, Ron Myers, M. Nooth and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Jimenez Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luis Gonzales v. Larry Blanton, et al
as 11-35852
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUIS JIMENEZ GONZALES
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY BLANTON, Sheriff, R. JENKINS, Captain, VANDERZWIEP, Lt. and others
Gonzales v. Parker et al
as 1:2011cv00784
Defendant:
Stan Czerniac and Denise Parker
Plaintiff:
Luis Jimenez Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
