Cases 31 - 40 of 108
Lank v. Sobertech, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00386
Plaintiff:
Brigitte Lank
Defendant:
Sobertech, Inc., Terence Lundy and Ryan Fischer
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
(PC) Valdez v. Newsom et al
as 1:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Michael Rodney Valdez
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, K. Hixon, B. Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Calloway v. CDCR, et al.
as 1:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Raymond Calloway
Defendant:
CDCR, L. Lundy, T Valdez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Don Lundy et al v. Investors Realty Services et al
as 8:2022cv01875
Plaintiff:
Don Lundy and Schuyler Dadzie
Defendant:
Investors Realty Services and Anaheim Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Don Lundy et al v. Investors Realty Services et al
as 2:2022cv07416
Plaintiff:
don lundy and Schuyler Dadzie
Defendant:
Anaheim Housing Authority and Investors Realty Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Binh Tran v. M. Webb et al
as 5:2022cv01469
Plaintiff:
Binh Tran
Defendant:
M. Webb, Correctional Officer Lundy, Correctional Officer Delao and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herrick Lundie v. L. Bird
as 2:2022cv05082
Petitioner:
Herrick Lundie
Respondent:
L Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Lundie v. Bird
as 2:2022cv01063
Petitioner:
Herrick Lundie
Respondent:
L. Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Threlkeld v. McKay et al
as 1:2022at00397
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. Threlkeld
Defendant:
Sharon McKay and L. Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
(PC) Threlkeld v. McKay et al
as 1:2022cv00656
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. Threlkeld
Defendant:
Sharon McKay and L. Lundy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
