Cases 51 - 60 of 231
Villnave v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2016cv00409
Plaintiff:
Steven Edward Villnave
Defendant:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID, Municipality Dallas County Jail, Craig Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayes v. Valdez et al
as 3:2016cv00343
Plaintiff:
Dennis Mayes
Defendant:
Lupe Valdez , Unknown Chaplain, Unknown North Tower Shift Supervisors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Valdez et al
as 3:2016cv00215
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Jones
Defendant:
Lupe Valdez, NFN Ann, NFN Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Xavier Lister v. Ian Purdue, et al
as 16-10052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
XAVIER LISTER
Defendant - Appellee:
JONES ROCKY, Assistant District Attorney, Dallas County, S. MCCARTHY, Assistant District Attorney, Dallas County, BERNARD MASSAR, Public Defender, Dallas County, also known as Ben and others
Rambo v. Valdez et al
as 3:2016cv00002
Plaintiff:
Ozie Rambo
Defendant:
Lupe Valdez, Dallas County Sheriff's Department, Lew Sterrett Criminal Justice Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Minei et al
as 3:2015cv04069
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Bennett
Defendant:
Joseph P Minei, Dianne Urey, William B Musgrave and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garza et al v. Dallas County Texas et al
as 3:2015cv04008
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Garza , Carlos Alvarez Castro , Jeremias Chevez and others
Defendant:
Dallas County, Texas and Lupe Valdez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Valdez et al
as 3:2015cv03966
Petitioner:
Kelvin Jones
Respondent:
Lupe Valdez and Parkland Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis v. Valdez
as 3:2015cv03952
Petitioner:
Albert J Davis
Respondent:
Lupe Valdez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Valdez
as 3:2015cv03510
Plaintiff:
Albert Joseph Davis
Defendant:
Lupe Valdez and Parkland/Jail Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
