Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lusk v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01181
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Lusk
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lusk v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv06103
Plaintiff:
James P. Lusk
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Johnson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2021cv10460
Plaintiff:
William Johnson, Victor Jones, David Kenney and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr
Lusk v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv01149
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Lusk
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Lusk v. McNamee et al
as 1:2021cv00208
Defendant:
Michael Connors, John Privitera, Simon Ballam and others
Plaintiff:
Jeanne Marie Lusk
Lusk et al v. Serve U Brands, Inc. et al
as 6:2017cv06451
Plaintiff:
Skyler Lusk , Tia Council , Viktoria O'Brien and others
Defendant:
Serve U Brands, Inc. , Insomnia Cookies, LLC and Seth Berkowitz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lusk et al v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 1:2017cv00232
Plaintiff:
Paul Michael Lusk and Sarah Jane Lusk
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rhee-Karn v. Lask
as 1:2015cv09946
Defendant:
Susan Chana Lask, Susan Lusk and Susan Lesk
Plaintiff:
Margaret Rhee-Karn
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Douglas R Dollinger and Kenneth Craig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
Lusk v. Roginski
as 1:2008cv01837
Plaintiff:
Susan Lusk
Defendant:
Lindsay Nicole Roginski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Lusk v. Roginski
as 7:2008cv01837
Plaintiff:
Susan Lusk
Defendant:
Lindsay Nicole Roginski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
