Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Yahola v. Bentley, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00320
Plaintiff:
Tacoma Alexander Yahola
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Luther Strange and Kim Tobias Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sunday v. Lee County Circuit Court et al
as 5:2012cv00590
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Sunday
Defendant:
Lee County Circuit Court, Kim Thomas, Patrick Goode and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Danford et al
as 2:2012cv00216
Plaintiff:
Terry Donnell Watson
Defendant:
Robert Danford, State of Alabama, Luther Strange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughley v. Strange et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2012cv00028
Plaintiff:
Johnny Hughley
Defendant:
Luther Strange, Alabama Public Safety Director and Jay Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadnax v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv01082
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Broadnax
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim J. Thomas, Alabama Board of Pardon and Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Strange et al
as 4:2011cv03223
Plaintiff:
Melvin Ray
Defendant:
Luther Strange and Attorney General for the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Department of Correction et al
as 2:2011cv00504
Plaintiff:
Malik Ione James
Defendant:
Department of Correction, Mary Cook, Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Department of Correction et al
as 2:2011cv02540
Plaintiff:
Malik Ione James
Defendant:
Department of Correction, Mary Cook, Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Daniels et al
as 1:2011cv00339
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Parker
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels, Luther Strange, Judge Shurlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00485
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lee Walker
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Scott Rouse, Robert Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
