Cases 31 - 40 of 68
Luv N Care Ltd et al v. Smiggle Pty Ltd
as 3:2017cv01658
Plaintiff:
Luv N Care Ltd and Nouri E Hakim
Defendant:
Smiggle Pty Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Luv n care Ltd v. Precious Moments Inc
as 3:2017cv01592
Defendant:
Precious Moments Inc
Plaintiff:
Luv N Care Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Luv N Care Ltd v. S C Products Inc et al
as 3:2017cv00822
Plaintiff:
Luv N Care Ltd
Defendant:
S C Products Inc and Michael L McGinley
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
McGinley et al v. Luv N Care Ltd
as 3:2017cv00821
Plaintiff:
Michael L McGinley and S C Products Inc
Defendant:
Luv N Care Ltd
Counter_claimant:
Luv N Care Ltd
Counter_defendant:
Michael L McGinley and S C Products Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Luv N Care Ltd, et al v. Atziloose L L C, et al
as 3:2017cv00240
Plaintiff:
Luv N Care Ltd and Admar International Inc
Defendant:
Atziloose L L C and Bombino Express Pvt Ltd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Luv N' Care, Ltd. v. Goldberg Cohen, LLP
as 16-3219
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
Luv N' Care, Ltd. and Admar International, Inc.
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Goldberg Cohen, LLP
Defendant - Appellee:
Lee A. Goldberg and Morris E. Cohen
Luv N Care Ltd v. Laurain et al
as 3:2016cv00777
Plaintiff:
Luv N Care Ltd
Defendant:
Lindsey Laurain and Eazy-P Z L L C
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Luv N Care Ltd v. S C Products Inc et al
as 3:2016cv00641
Plaintiff:
Luv N Care Ltd
Defendant:
S C Products Inc and Michael L McGinley
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Luv N' Care Ltd v. Jackel International Ltd et al
as 3:2015cv02692
Plaintiff:
Luv N Care Ltd
Defendant:
Jackel International Ltd , Mayborn U S A Inc , Jackel China Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Luv N Care Ltd v. Groupo Rimar
as 3:2015cv02349
Plaintiff:
Luv N Care Ltd
Defendant:
Groupo Rimar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
