Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Chanel, Inc. v. ADAM STEBER et al
as 0:2016cv62987
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
ADAM STEBER, Advance Way, Alexis Christman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Oliver v. Schwartz
as 3:2015cv01194
Petitioner:
King Michael Oliver
Respondent:
William Schwartz
Defendant:
David R Herndon, Timothy Tiny, Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Borah et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 2:2015cv09133
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Borah , Scott Lemke , Otis R. Shinn and others
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection AG, Syngenta Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Luera v. Godinez et al
as 3:2015cv00350
Petitioner:
Jose Luera
Respondent:
Salvador A. Godinez , Tracey Engelson , Margaret Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bentz v. Atchinson et al
as 3:2014cv01132
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
Michael Atchinson, Rick Harrington, Salvidor Godinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards v. Lynch et al
as 5:2014cv03190
Plaintiff:
Calvin E. Richards, II
Defendant:
Kent Lynch, Steven Wilhoff, Bill Lyerla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. Lyerla et al
as 3:2014cv00492
Plaintiff:
Anthony Reynolds
Defendant:
Douglas H Lyerla, L Maue, MacDonough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luera v. Godinez et al
as 1:2013cv02041
Plaintiff:
Jose Luera
Defendant:
Salvador A. Godinez, Tracey Engelson, Margaret Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon Martin v. Donald Gatez, et al
as 12-2010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRANDON MARTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD GATEZ, Deputy Director, DAVE REDNOUR, Warden, C. HASMEYER, Internal Affairs and others
Martin v. Gatez et al
as 3:2011cv01048
Plaintiff:
Brandon Martin
Respondent:
Donald Gatez, David Rednour, C Hasmeyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
