Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Chen v. Lyft, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01330
Plaintiff:
Yuan Chen
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc., David Risher and Erin Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gill et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv04379
Plaintiff:
Taje Gill, Esterphanie St. Juste and Benjamin Valdez
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Piero Bugoni v. Checkr, Inc., et al
as 21-16994
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PIERO A. BUGONI
Defendant / Appellee:
CHECKR, INC., DOORDASH, INC., INSTACART, INC. and others
S. Mendel v. Liane Randolph, et al
as 21-15910
Defendant:
ELAINE L. CHAO, in her official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Transportation, ANNE KRAMER, Attorney of the law firm Lichten & Liss-Riordan, P.C., MICHAEL PICKER, in his individual and official capacity as President, Commissioner, California Public Utilities Commission and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CLIFFORD RECHTSCHFFEN, in his indiviual and official capacity as Commissioner, California Public Utilities Commission, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., MARITZA PEREZ, in her individual and official capacity as Section Supervisor Badge #11 Transportationb License Section California Public Utilities Commission and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
S. PATRICK MENDEL
Mehta v. Green et al
as 4:2020cv09364
Defendant:
Jonathan Christodoro, Hiroshi Mikitani, Logan Green and others
Plaintiff:
Vishal Mehta
Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
as 4:2020cv05640
Defendant:
Apple Inc. and Lyft, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Epic Games, Inc.
Interested Party:
Donald R. Cameron, Kabam, Inc., Microsoft Corporation and others
Not Classified By Court:
Roblox, Inc., Spotify USA Inc., Yoga Buddhi Co. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Facebook, Inc.
Petitioner:
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 18 Media Organizations, App Annie Inc. and Amazon.com Services LLC
Amicus Curiae:
Robert Pepper, Edward W. Hayter, Stephen H. Schwartz and others
Intervenor:
Nintendo of America Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
John Rogers, et al v. Lyft, Inc.
as 20-15700
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AMIR EBADAT, HANY FARAG, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and JOHN ROGERS
Defendant / Appellant:
LYFT, INC.
John Rogers, et al v. Lyft, Inc.
as 20-15689
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMIR EBADAT, HANY FARAG, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and JOHN ROGERS
Defendant / Appellee:
LYFT, INC.
S. Mendel v. Elaine Chao, et al
as 19-17380
Defendant / Appellee:
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN P.C., a law firm, RAYMOND MARTINEZ, in his official capacity as Adminisrator, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, CLIFFORD RECHTSCHFFEN, in his indiviual and official capacity as Commissioner, California Public Utilities Commission and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
S. PATRICK MENDEL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
