Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Oliver v. Lyft, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv05505
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc., Logan Green, Kristin Sverchek and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Oliver
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
U.S. Chamber of Commerce, et al v. City of Seattle, et al
as 17-35640
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and RASIER, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SEATTLE, SEATTLE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES and FRED PODESTA, in his official capacity as Director, Finance and Administrative Services, City of Seattle
Amicus Curiae:
ANTITRUST LAW PROFESSORS
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
DAN CLARK, TAMI DUNLAP, ALI HASSON, JENNIFER IMMEL, GARY KUNZE, ELISABETH LOWE, DALE MONTZ, ABDI MOTAN, FREDERICK RICE, MICHAEL RIEBS, and FIREW TESHOME. and LYFT, INC.
Peterson v. Lyft, Inc.
as 3:2016cv07343
Plaintiff:
Pete Peterson
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-16876
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bodie v. Lyft, Inc.
as 3:2016cv02558
Plaintiff:
Jason David Bodie
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Teague v. Lyft, Inc.
as 3:2016cv01768
Plaintiff:
Bryan Teague
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
O'Connor v. Lyft, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00351
Plaintiff:
Douglas O'Connor
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv03008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Wolf v. Lyft, Inc.
as 4:2015cv01441
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Wolf and Emily Wolf
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
