Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riggs v. Lynch et al
as 2:2016cv00709
Plaintiff:
Kelly Patrick Riggs
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Joyce White Vance, Daniel Fortune and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Broadhead v. Baldwison et al
as 2:2014cv01413
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
J Baldwison, T Thomas, Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Voyles et al
as 2:2014cv01397
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
Voyles, M Gasdon, J Giddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Rogers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00676
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
J. Rogers, Officer Scott, David Tytell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Calhoun et al
as 2:2014cv00634
Plaintiff:
James M Broadhead
Defendant:
Calhoun, Scott, Evelgor Dorsett and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Veteto v. The Justices and Clerks of the Supreme Court of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00516
Plaintiff:
Ronald D. Veteto
Defendant:
The Justices and Clerks of the Supreme Court of Alabama, The Judges and Clerks of the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals, The Judges of the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hall v. Pate et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2007cv00766
Plaintiff:
Kenton M. Hall
Defendant:
Monica Pate, E. M. Roberts, Bill Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
