Cases 1 - 10 of 15
James et al v. Hoy Health LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00323
Plaintiff:
Sweeney M James, The James M. Sweeney Trust and James M. Sweeney
Defendant:
Hoy Health LLC and Hoy Health Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00624
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv01230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
James v. Davis et al
as 4:2016cv02469
Plaintiff:
Trinity M James
Defendant:
Lorie Davis , Tony R O'Hare, Christopher S. Lacox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Watkins et al
as 3:2014cv01817
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wayne Hunter
Defendant:
Craig Watkins, Dallas Police Department and M James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bates et al v. Laminack et al
as 2:2012cv00387
Plaintiff:
Frank Bates , Richard Brown , Bruce D Cochran and others
Defendant:
Richard N Laminack, John M. O'Quinn & Associates, PLLC d/b/a The O'Quinn Law Firm, John M. O'Quinn & Associates, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
James et al v. United States Of America
as 5:2012cv00800
Plaintiff:
Antoinette F. James and Louis M. James
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
United States of America v. James
as 1:2012mc00002
Respondent:
Mildred M James
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
