Cases 1 - 10 of 48
US v. Lavon Williams
as 23-6826
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LAVON M. WILLIAMS
Steve Riddick v. Rick White
as 23-6640
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVE RIDDICK
Defendant / Appellee:
RICK WHITE, Warden, SHANNON FULLER, Ast. Warden, LARRY COLLINS, Unit Manager and others
David Meyers v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6407
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, VDOC Director, U.S. DISTRICT COURT ROANOKE DIVISION, ELIZABETH KAY DILLON, U.S. Judge and others
Kareem Kirk v. Craig Davis
as 23-6161
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAREEM ABDULLAH KIRK
Defendant / Appellee:
CRAIG STEVENSON DAVIS, Captain, in his Individual and Official capacities, WILLIAM TODD WALTHER, Detective, in his Individual and Official capacities, CITY OF CHARLOTTE, in its Official Capacity and others
US v. Jason Williams
as 22-7049
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JASON M. WILLIAMS
Terry Ofori v. Gary Williams
as 21-7219
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRY K. OFORI
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY M. WILLIAMS, Clerk and W. ALLAN SHARRETT, Judge
US v. Lavon Williams
as 21-7190
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LAVON M. WILLIAMS
David Meyers v. M. Williams
as 21-6923
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY FINANCIAL CENTER KANSAS CITY, MO, MS. SPIVEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. T. Dorton
as 21-6882
Defendant / Appellee:
M. WILLIAMS, Fiscal Tech of Wallen Ridge State Prison, FINANCIAL OFFICE STAFF OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT ROANOKE DIVISION, M. BRYANT, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Robert Garrett, Jr. v. Chad Binkley
as 21-6112
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LOUIS GARRETT, JR., a/k/a Chubby, a/k/a Chubb, a/k/a Tru, a/k/a Kweli, a/k/a Justice
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES M. WILLIAMS, JR., KEVIN CROSS and CHAD BINKLEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
