Cases 41 - 50 of 55
BATES et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2014cv00964
Plaintiff:
SHAWNTAY BATES and M. B.
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
M. B. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2014cv00394
Plaintiff:
M. B. and MARNI BARRON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
M. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv01704
Plaintiff:
RHONDA MOORE , B. M. , HELEN JONES and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Carrette et al
as 2:2012cv02633
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Mario Carrette and M & B, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151 Communications Act of 1934
M. R., et al v. Susan Dreyfus, et al
as 12-80127
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
M. R., S. J., C. B. and others
Defendant - Respondent:
SUSAN DREYFUS, in her professional capacity as Secretary of Washington State Department of Social and Health Services and WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES, a Department of the State of Washington
NLRB v. M&B Services, Inc.
as 10-60718
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
M&B SERVICES, INC.
In re: Berryhill
as 10-7053
Petitioner:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Respondent:
BRAD HENRY, Governor of Oklahoma, JARI ASKINS, Lieutenant Governor of Oklahoma, W.A. DREW EDMONDSON, Attorney General, Attorney General and others
NLRB v. M&B Services, Inc.
as 10-60198
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
M&B SERVICES, INC.
Samuel McNeil v. Home Budget Loans et al
as 2:2009cv07588
Plaintiff:
Samuel McNeil
Defendant:
Home Budget Loans, Citi Bank, United Title Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
M B Plaza, LLC v. KeyCorp Real Estate Capital Markets, Inc.
as 8:2009cv01605
Plaintiff:
M B Plaza, LLC
Defendant:
KeyCorp Real Estate Capital Markets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Real Estate Settlement Procedure (RESPA) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
