Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ortiz v. A M B Mechanical, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01328
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ortiz
Defendant:
A M B MECHANICAL, INC. and Aaron Mathis Brach
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
HUNTER v. M-B COMPANIES, INC.
as 2:2019cv04838
Defendant:
M-B COMPANIES, INC. and M-B COMPANIES
Plaintiff:
RYAN HUNTER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
WEST v. B&T HOME BUILDERS 2, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv02748
Defendant:
B&T HOME BUILDERS LP, M B CRAFTERS OF PA, INC., MOSHE BARAZANI and others
Plaintiff:
MARQUISE WEST
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ramirez-Vasquez v. M&B Packaging, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04773
Defendant:
Elegant Dessert NY Inc., M&B Packaging, Inc. and Benjamin Weiss
Plaintiff:
Analy Ramirez-Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Johnson v. M & B Products Inc.
as 8:2016cv00362
Plaintiff:
Larry Johnson
Defendant:
M & B Products Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Simpson v. M&B Lounge LP et al
as 3:2015cv02899
Plaintiff:
Tynisha Simpson
Defendant:
M&B Lounge LP, Roberta-Claire LLC, Leyla Measho and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Alvidrez v. M&B Chuck Wagon, LLC et al
as 5:2013cv04746
Plaintiff:
Dominic Alvidrez
Defendant:
M&B Chuck Wagon, LLC and Marc Lehrer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lewis v. M&B Distributing, Inc.
as 0:2012cv62359
Plaintiff:
Andre Lewis
Defendant:
M&B Distributing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Camacho-Cordova et al v. Vital Brasil et al
as 5:2008cv05756
Plaintiff:
Isidro Camacho-Cordova , Roberto Lopez-Ruuiz , Gerardo Lopez-Ibarra and others
Defendant:
Vital Brasil , M. Brasil Drywall, Inc. and M & B Painting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Camacho-Cordova et al v. Vital Brasil et al
as 3:2008cv05756
Plaintiff:
Isidro Camacho-Cordova, Isidro Camacho-Cordova, Roberto Lopez-Ruuiz and others
Defendant:
Vital Brasil, M. Brasil Drywall, Inc. and M & B Painting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
