Cases 1 - 10 of 24
BARON v. DIXON et al
as 4:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
ROBERT M BARON
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Susan Polk v. Mary Lattimore, et al
as 22-16706
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSAN MAE POLK
Defendant / Appellee:
MARY LATTIMORE, Warden, L. HUNTER, V. H. CAMBRIDGE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2714
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Baron v. Talkspace, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Ivan M. Baron
Defendant:
Talkspace, Inc., Oren Frank, Mark Hirschhorn and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv07163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Stidhum v. 161-10 Hillside Auto Ave, LLC
as 21-1653
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Leticia Francine Stidhum
Defendant / Appellee:
161-10 Hillside Auto Ave, LLC, DBA Hillside Auto Outlet, Hillside Auto Mall, Inc., DBA Hillside Auto Mall, Ishaque Thanwalla and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05458
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Stidhum et al v. 161-10 Hillside Auto Ave, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01625
Defendant:
Ronald M Baron, 161-10 Hillside Auto Ave, LLC, Hillside Auto Mall Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Leticia Stidhum and David Manrique
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
WALKER et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv02081
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CLEMONS, CHRISTINE TRIEBOLD, JANICE SMITH and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
