Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HOWARD v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 5:2022cv00259
Plaintiff:
MARTIN M. HOWARD
Cross Claimant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, CORNING, INC., FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Defendant:
BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., CBS CORPORATION, CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
COOPER INDUSTRIES LLC, CRANE COMPANY, EATON CORPORATION and others
Cross Defendant:
THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, GTE OPERATIONS SUPPORT, INC., THE OKONITE COMPANY and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
MIGHTY AUTO PARTS and MIGHTY AUTO PARTS WESTERN NEW YORK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00905
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Riley v. Grainey et al
as 3:2012cv02470
Plaintiff:
Nathan Riley
Defendant:
David Grainey, Michael Smith, Mark Cappoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOWARD v. AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES LTD.
as 2:2011cv57505
Plaintiff:
ROBERT M. HOWARD
Defendant:
AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES LTD.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HOWARD v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv57506
Plaintiff:
ROBERT M. HOWARD
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HOWARD et al v. UNARCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67616
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER M. HOWARD and NORMA HOWARD
Defendant:
UNARCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00962
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 158
HOWARD V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv36359
Plaintiff:
ROBERT M. HOWARD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00017
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
