Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Smith v. Lubken, et al.
as 1:2010cv00348
Plaintiff:
Michael LeNoir Smith
Defendant:
Lubken, J. A. Fogal, M. Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Hightower v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 09-80182
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
THOMAS A. HIGHTOWER
Defendant - Respondent:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, EDWARD S. ALEMEDIA, N. GRANNIS and others
Michael Victory v. Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 09-17613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL VICTORY
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, JEANNE WOODFORD, Director of Corrections, JAMES A. YATES, Warden and others
Hightower v. Schwarzenegger, et al
as 1:2004cv06028
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Hightower
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger , Edward S Alemedia , N. Grannis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dameon Ham v. Ken Clark, et al
as 09-16820
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMEON HAM
Defendant - Appellee:
KEN CLARK, Warden, NANCY GRANNIS, Chief of Inmate Appeals, E. FLORES, M.D. and others
Deadmon v. Grannis
as 1:2007cv00927
Plaintiff:
Relaun V. Deadmon
Defendant:
N. Grannis, M Hodges-Wilkins, J. William McGuinness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. Wilkins et al
as 1:2009cv00814
Plaintiff:
Jerry E. Torres
Defendant:
M. Hodges Wilkins, N. Grannis, Maurice J. Unious and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Yates et al
as 1:2009cv00808
Plaintiff:
Michael LeNoir Smith
Defendant:
James Yates, Gray, Fogal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darryl Wakefield v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 09-15885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL KENT WAKEFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, M. CATE, K. HURDLE and others
Reynolds v. Gerstel et al
as 1:2009cv00680
Plaintiff:
Ferdinand Reynolds
Defendant:
K. Gerstel, C. Schutt, Warren H. Liu and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
