Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Johnson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2020cv01749
Plaintiff:
Bailey M. Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00639
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hilton v. Premo et al
as 2:2012cv01373
Petitioner:
Eric L. Hilton
Respondent:
Gene M. Johnson and Jeff Premo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc
as 3:2012cv01006
Plaintiff:
Ynona M Johnson
Defendant:
Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv01161
Defendant:
Ed, Mr. Acevado, S. Afhook and others
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Johnson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2011cv00254
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Sephan M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Kyger v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2007cv00481
Plaintiff:
Scott William Kyger
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Oregon Department of Corrections, M. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Pacific Coast Seafoods Inc et al
as 3:2007cv00296
Plaintiff:
Brad M Johnson
Defendant:
F/V Pacific Future, Pacific Future LLC, F/V Pacific Hooker and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
IN RE: LAW STUDENT APPEARANCES
as 3:2007mc09006
Plaintiff:
Kasia Rutledge, Erik Eklund, Jay Bodzin and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
