Cases 41 - 50 of 98
David v. Akies et al
as 1:2022cv02691
Plaintiff:
Deonta David
Defendant:
Randy Akies and Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wheeler v. Maddox
as 1:2022cv02666
Plaintiff:
Aaron Levi Wheeler
Defendant:
Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diarra v. Maddox
as 1:2022cv02038
Petitioner:
Moussa U'nra Diarra
Respondent:
Sheriff Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DIARRA v. U.S DISTRICT COURT CLERK NORTHERN DIST. GEORGIA et al
as 1:2022cv01862
Petitioner:
MOUSSA DIARRA
Respondent:
U.S DISTRICT COURT CLERK NORTHERN DIST. GEORGIA, Debra Deberry and Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmonds v. Maddox et al
as 1:2022cv01479
Plaintiff:
Norman Simmonds
Defendant:
Melody M. Maddox, Randy Akies, Anson Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strickland v. Madison et al
as 1:2022cv00291
Plaintiff:
Nathan De'Jarvis Strickland
Defendant:
Mr. Madison, Mr. Randy Akies, Ms. Melody M. Maddox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAWFORD v. WEST TENNESSEE DETENTION FACILITY et al
as 1:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
DEMARCUS DEON CRAWFORD
Defendant:
WEST TENNESSEE DETENTION FACILITY, HUGH HARVEY, JR., JODY S. PICKENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Underwood v. Maddox et al
as 1:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
Travon DeAundre Underwood
Defendant:
Melody M. Maddox and Larandy Aikens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fauntleroy v. Maddox
as 1:2021cv05271
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Fauntleroy
Defendant:
Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Underwood v. DeKalb County Jail Staff
as 1:2021cv04764
Plaintiff:
Travon DeAundre Underwood
Defendant:
DeKalb County Jail Staff, Melody M. Maddox and Larandy Aikens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
