Cases 1 - 10 of 118
McDonald v. CIGNA, Inc.
as 3:2015cv03816
Plaintiff:
James M. McDonald
Defendant:
CIGNA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Anna Tanguay et al v. American Medical Systems Inc et al
as 2:2013cv05937
Defendant:
American Medical Systems Holdings Inc, American Medical Systems Inc, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Arnold, Patricia Ann Babb-Farrow, Dolores Baker and others
In re: Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) Antitrust Litigation
as 4:2007md01819
Plaintiff:
Michael Brooks, Rhonda L. Jacobs, Sharon Defren and others
Defendant:
Renesas Technology America, Inc., Epson America, Inc., NEC Electronics Corporation and others
Not Yet Classified:
Kyocera Wireless Corporation, Smart Modular Technologies, Inc., Extreme Networks, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
David Bratton, Communication Mega-Sat Inc., Bryar Law Corporation and others
Interested Party:
James B Wright and Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Special Master:
Judge (Ret.) Fern M Smith and Martin Quinn
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Robin McEntee
In Re:
Static Random Access Memory (SRAM)
Other:
Barbara Cochran
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Murphy v. California Department of Corrections, et al
as 2:2013cv00710
Petitioner:
John Paul Murphy
Respondent:
California Department of Corrections, M. Cate and M. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Vaught v. Clark et al
as 2:2009cv03422
Plaintiff:
Elbert Vaught
Defendant:
D. Clark, B. Gower, M. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coyle v. Cates et al
as 2:2012cv02446
Plaintiff:
Sean Nicholas Coyle
Defendant:
Matthew Cates, M. McDonald and "D" Facility Capt. Lt. Sgt.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sisco v. McDonald
as 2:2012cv01804
Petitioner:
Eric M. Sisco
Respondent:
M. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Serna v. McDonald
as 2:2012cv01562
Petitioner:
Antoevino Rocky Serna
Respondent:
M. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
