Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Reilly, et al. v. County of Los Angeles, et al.
as 23-4016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW REILLY, an individual and M. R., an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a chartered subdivision of the State of California, CITY OF GLENDORA, a municipality, RICHARD GIRON and others
Uber Technologies, Inc., et al. v. United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
as 23-3445
Petitioner:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC and RASIER-CA, LLC
Respondent:
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court:
JANE DOE LS 340, an individual, KATHERINE HYLIN, an individual, E. R., an individual and others
M. R., et al v. Burlington Area School District, et al
as 23-2654
Plaintiff / Appellant:
M. R., minor, individually, by and through their parent, DARNISHA GARBADE, L. H., minor, individually, by and through their parent, DARNISHA GARBADE and DARNISHA GARBADE
Defendant / Appellee:
BURLINGTON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT and SCOTT SCHIMMEL
Z. F., et al v. Ripon Unified School District, et al
as 19-16725
Defendant / Appellee:
MODESTO CITY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION, RIPON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES, RICHARD JACOBS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
L. H., a minor, J. A., and individually, A. N., a minor, by and through his Parents and others
Frederick Dutton, Jr. v. J.J. Reynolds, et al
as 15-15183
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK CHARLES DUTTON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
J.J. REYNOLDS, individual capacity, M. MUSSER, individual capacity, J. T. MERRITT and others
Z. F., et al v. Ripon Unified School District, et al
as 13-15665
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Z. F., a minor, by and through his Parents, M. A. F., and individually, J. F., and individually and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RIPON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, RIPON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
