Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Whitaker v. Smith
as 3:2023cv00137
Petitioner:
Lance Whitaker
Respondent:
Donna M. Smith
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Carranza et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Michael Carranza and Juan F. Martinez
Defendant:
Crystal M. Smith and Secura Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Smith v. Monsanto Company
as 2:2020cv00002
Plaintiff:
Alice M. Smith
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McAllister et al v. Aaron Oil Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00302
Plaintiff:
John R. McAllister and Lindsey N. McAllister
Defendant:
David M. Smith and Aaron Oil Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bourgeoris et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2018cv00450
Plaintiff:
Steven Bussard, Cecil Taylor, Gregory Watts Simms and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv00598
Plaintiff:
Senora M. Smith
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Primerica Life Insurance Company v. Smith et al
as 3:2017cv00416
Plaintiff:
Primerica Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Chelsea Smith, Opel Weatherspoon and Christopher M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Payne v. Bryant et al
as 1:2015cv00168
Plaintiff:
David E. Payne
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Marshall Fisher, Raymond T. Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Gullett et al
as 3:2014cv00619
Plaintiff:
Randall M. Smith
Defendant:
Cory D. Gullett and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Goff et al v. CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00437
Plaintiff:
Alice Goff , Myra A. Hartfield , Leo Hawkins and others
Defendant:
CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc., DEF Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
