Cases 1 - 10 of 104
Ricky M. Williams v. Qyo Phorenozo et al
as 2:2023cv09798
Plaintiff:
Ricky M. Williams
Defendant:
Qyo Phorenozo, Los Angeles Sheriffs Department, Robert G. Luna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Williams
as 2:2023cv02634
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Peter M. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Brewen
as 3:2022cv04695
Plaintiff:
Reginald M. Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Brewen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gabriel Pies-Lonsdale v. M. Williams et al
as 5:2022cv01095
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Pies-Lonsdale
Defendant:
M. Williams, Broughton, Barron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pies-Lonsdale v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv00854
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Pies-Lonsdale
Defendant:
M. Williams, Broughton, Barron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv Fed. Question: Bivens-Prisoner
(PC)Cox v. Bal et al
as 2:2022cv00804
Plaintiff:
Ernest Lee Cox, Jr.
Defendant:
I. Bal, M. Williams and T. Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Williams v. Gigi Matteson
as 2:2022cv00671
Petitioner:
Joseph M. Williams
Respondent:
Gigi Matteson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2021cv08240
Plaintiff:
Allan K. Campbell, Alton Mallet, Angela Thomas and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2021cv06658
Plaintiff:
Beverly Williams, Daniel Valdivia, Daniel Keith Brown and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
