Cases 1 - 8 of 8
M.R. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2021cv01858
Plaintiff:
M.R. and Linda Rahal
Defendant:
District of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
M.-R. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2021cv00177
Plaintiff:
E. M., EDWARD M.-R., T. R.-M. and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROBERTS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2020cv01227
Plaintiff:
HAMID MUGHAL, M.R., NATASHA GROVE and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. M.R. OF AMBOY, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01405
Defendant:
H.W. OF AMBOY, LLC D/B/A AMBOY CARE CENTER, M.R. OF AMBOY, LLC D/B/A AMBOY CARE CENTER, H.W. OF AMBOY, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EMANUEL PASTREICH, RODERICK S. BASHIR, STEPHEN ABRECHT and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
M.R. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2011cv00649
Plaintiff:
M.R. , ROBERT RENNHACK and MARJORIE RENNHACK
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. M.R. DRYWALL DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
as 1:2010cv00306
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, GARY J. MEYERS, POLITICAL ACTION TOGETHER FUND and others
Defendant:
M.R. DRYWALL DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
MIKKILINENI v. GIBSON-THOMAS ENGINEERING COMPANY et al
as 1:2009cv01320
Plaintiff:
M.R. MIKKILINENI
Defendant:
GIBSON-THOMAS ENGINEERING COMPANY, EDWARD SCHMITT, MARK GERA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. M.R. DRYWALL DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
as 1:2009cv00657
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, GARY J. MEYERS, POLITICAL ACTION TOGETHER FUND and others
Defendant:
M.R. DRYWALL DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
