Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Helms et al v. Macy's Retail Holding, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00103
Plaintiff:
Michael Byrne Helms and J.T. Helms
Defendant:
Macy's Retail Holding, Inc. , John Doe and Employee of Macy's Retail Holding Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv60985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Proxicom Wireless, LLC v. Macy's, Inc et al
as 6:2018cv00064
Plaintiff:
Proxicom Wireless, LLC
Defendant:
Macy's, Inc and Macy's Florida Stores, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Macy's, Inc and Macy's Florida Stores, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Proxicom Wireless, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv24482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0623
Hettinger v. Macy's Credit and Customer Services, Inc.
as 8:2017cv02974
Plaintiff:
Henry Hettinger
Defendant:
Macy's Credit and Customer Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
HABERSHAM v. MACY'S FLORIDA STORES, LLC
as 4:2017cv00429
Plaintiff:
SHEILA HABERSHAM
Defendant:
MACY'S FLORIDA STORES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Integrity Toys, Inc. v. Macy's Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03021
Plaintiff:
Integrity Toys, Inc.
Defendant:
Macy's Inc. and Bloomingdale's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Adler v. MACY'S FLORIDA STORES, LLC. et al
as 1:2017cv22321
Plaintiff:
Cindy Adler
Defendant:
Macy's Florida Stores, LLC. and Macy's Corporate Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GARNER v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 5:2017cv00233
Plaintiff:
VALENCIA GARNER RESTRICTED - CHECK FILER STATUS
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, ATLANTA GEORGIA, LENOX MALL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
