Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Malone v. Dix
as 3:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
William Malone, Jr.
Respondent:
Sheriff Darrell Dix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malone v. Spalding County
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
William Malone, Jr.
Defendant:
Spalding County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BULLOCK v. SHAVER et al
as 1:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY BULLOCK
Defendant:
WARDEN BRIAN SHAVER, DEPUTY WARDEN DELVIN PEOPLES, UNIT MANAGER NATALIE MALONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eckerd v. Lush et al
as 2:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Eckerd
Defendant:
Nigel Lush, Keith Higgins, Glynn County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLOYD v. MALONE, et al.
as 1:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
EDDIE FRANK FLOYD, III
Defendant:
MS MALONE, OFC THOMPSON, Anthony and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. Malone et al
as 2:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Eddie Frank Floyd, III
Defendant:
Mrs. Malone, Officer Thompson, Mrs. Anthony and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCURTY v. PEPER et al
as 1:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
DREXEL MCCURTY
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN PEPER, UNIT MANAGER D JONES, NURSE WRITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drummond v. Proctor et al
as 2:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Adam Drummond
Defendant:
Sheriff Jim Proctor, Larry Phelps, Corporal Jordan Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Jackson et al
as 1:2022cv00913
Plaintiff:
Danny Dwayne Malone
Defendant:
Sergeant Kenyon Jackson, Marietta Police Department and City of Marietta, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MALONE v. USA
as 1:2022cv00013
Petitioner:
JAMES MALONE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
