Cases 1 - 6 of 6
COPELAND et al v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2023cv23409
Plaintiff:
MARCIA COPELAND, M.D. and MILDRED JACKSON
Defendant:
JUDGE ANNE THOMPSON, JUDGE FREDA WOLFSON, JUDGE NOEL HILLMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. ACCELERATED REHAB AND PAIN MANAGEMENT, P.A. et al
as 2:2020cv16361
Defendant:
LEO STATEN, D.O., ACCELERATED REHAB AND PAIN MANAGEMENT, P.A., MEDICSURG, P.C. and others
Plaintiff:
GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
COPELAND v. TOWNSHIP OF BELLMAWR et al
as 1:2017cv12104
Plaintiff:
MARCIA COPELAND, M.D.
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF BELLMAWR, STATE OF NEW JERSEY , ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. INSTERSTATE MULTI-SPECIALTY MEDICAL GROUP, P.C. et al
as 2:2017cv05725
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. , GEICO INDEMNITY CO. , GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
INSTERSTATE MULTI-SPECIALTY MEDICAL GROUP, P.C., HIGHLAND MEDICAL GROUP, P.C., ALEXANDR ZAITSEV and others
Cross_claimant:
ANTONIO CICCONE
Cross_defendant:
ANTONIO CICCONE , MARCIA COPELAND, M.D., EUGENE GORMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
COPELAND v. NEWFIELD BANK et al
as 1:2017cv00017
Plaintiff:
MARCIA COPELAND, M.D.
Defendant:
NEWFIELD BANK, LINDA GAZZARA and GAZZARA REALTY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0052
Copeland et al v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 3:2015cv07431
Plaintiff:
MARCIA COPELAND, M.D. and Minta Smith
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE , GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE ADMINISTRATION, Judges Administration for New Jersey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
