Cases 41 - 50 of 233
MUHAMMAD v. LAMAS et al
as 1:2013cv00337
Petitioner:
BUWLUS A. MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS and REBECCA R. HAYWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WRIGHT v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2013cv06420
Petitioner:
JAMAL WRIGHT
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SIERRA v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2013cv06264
Petitioner:
JESUS SIERRA
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS, SUPERINTENDENT SCI-BENNER and ATTORNEY GENERAL COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hankins v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2013cv02565
Plaintiff:
Robert Hankins
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Jerome Walsh, Vincent Mooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARDY v. LAMAS et al
as 1:2013cv02539
Petitioner:
KENNETH M. HARDY, JR.
Respondent:
Marirosa Lamas and KATHLEEN KAIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARDY v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2013cv01352
Petitioner:
KENNETH M. HARDY, JR.
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS and KATHLEEN KAIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Piskanin v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2013cv02341
Plaintiff:
Michael John Piskanin
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Marirosa Lamas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WHITACRE v. LAMAS
as 2:2013cv01286
Petitioner:
RANDY CLARK WHITACRE
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PRUITT v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2013cv01262
Petitioner:
FRANK PRUITT
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SANTIGAGO v. LAMAS et al
as 5:2013cv05070
Petitioner:
BENJAMIN LEE SANTIAGO
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
