Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Grenon v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv20190
Plaintiff:
Mark Scott Grenon
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SOUTHARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv58175
Plaintiff:
MARK SCOTT SOUTHARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCOTT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv09537
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARK SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCOTT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv44255
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARK SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MICENSKY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv33773
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARK SCOTT MICENSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Denson v. Quarno Auto Salvage et al
as 6:2020cv00146
Plaintiff:
Eddie Denson
Defendant:
Quarno Auto Salvage and Mark Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv00924
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
MARK SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCLAIN et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03126
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS HAGER, JOSHUA WIKHOLM, DANNY BRADEN and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Iles v. Lester et al
as 8:2010cv00694
Plaintiff:
Terrence D. Iles, Sr.
Defendant:
Trilly Lester, City of Tampa Commissioners, Jane Castor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hess v. Blackfoot Electric Corporation et al
as 8:2009cv01049
Plaintiff:
Roger Hess
Defendant:
Blackfoot Electric Corporation and Mark Scott
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
