Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Jones v. Sims et al
as 2:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Jamerrel Marque Jones
Defendant:
Charlie Sims, Terrell Carson and Chenetta Cains
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hillie v. Holmes
as 3:2021cv00250
Plaintiff:
Gregory Marque Hillie
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
George T. Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hillie v. Coleman
as 4:2021cv00043
Petitioner:
Gregory Marque Hillie
Respondent:
Linda F. Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Hillie v. Webster
as 4:2021cv00005
Petitioner:
Gregory Marque Hillie
Respondent:
Charles E. Webster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hillie v. Williams et al
as 3:2020cv00236
Plaintiff:
Gregory Marque Hillie
Defendant:
Lynn Fitch, Sheriff Kelvin Williams and Ronald King
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hillie v. Coleman et al
as 3:2020cv00177
Plaintiff:
Gregory Marque Hillie
Defendant:
Chief Justice Judge Linda F. Coleman, MS Attorney General Lynn Fitch, Superintendent Ronald King and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hillie v. Webster
as 3:2020cv00103
Plaintiff:
Gregory Marque Hillie
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Charles E. Webster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan
as 1:2019cv00912
Plaintiff:
Marques Thomas
Defendant:
Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2018cv00771
Petitioner:
Kendrick Marques Bell
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Respondent:
State of Mississippi, James Fillyaw and Ronald King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hillie v. Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
as 4:2018cv00068
Petitioner:
Gregory Marque Hillie
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
