Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Brandon Harris v. Brian Rives, et al
as 22-5838
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON MARQUE HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT BRIAN RIVES, DEPUTY J. L. HENDRICKS, DEPUTY JOHN HURT and others
Brandon Harris v. Brian Rives, et al
as 22-5834
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON MARQUE HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT BRIAN RIVES, DEPUTY J. L. HENDRICKS, DEPUTY JOHN HURT and others
Brandon Harris v. Brian Rives, et al
as 22-5490
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON MARQUE HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT BRIAN RIVES, DEPUTY J. L. HENDRICKS, DEPUTY JOHN HURT and others
Brandon Harris v. Brian Rives, et al
as 20-5863
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPUTY JOHN HURT, CHRISTIAN COUNTY JAIL STAFF, SGT. LEVI ROBINSON, in their individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON MARQUE HARRIS
Brandon Harris v. Rives, et al
as 19-5761
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTIAN COUNTY JAIL STAFF, DEPUTY HENDRICKS, LT. RIVES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON MARQUE HARRIS
Harris v. Rives et al
as 5:2019cv00043
Plaintiff:
Brandon Marque Harris
Defendant:
Christian County Jail Staff, Deputy Hurt, Lt. Rives and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AKBAR et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC.
as 2:2012cv02606
Plaintiff:
AKMAL HAKIM AKBAR , TERRY T. ALLEN , MIKE BANKS and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AKBAR et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC.
as PAE/2:12-cv-02606
Plaintiff:
AKMAL HAKIM AKBAR , TERRY T. ALLEN , MIKE BANKS and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC.
Gennaire Harris v. T. Gonzale
as 11-70416
Petitioner:
GENNAIRE MARQUES HARRIS
Respondent:
T. L. GONZALES
Gennaire Harris v. People of the State of Califor, et al
as 11-55135
Petitioner - Appellant:
GENNAIRE MARQUES HARRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and WARDEN, California State Prison
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
