Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Berger v. Baptiest et al
as 3:2022cv01312
Plaintiff:
Jackie Berger
Defendant:
John Baptiest, R. Bassa, Centurion Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corey Howell v. Marsha Nichols, et al
as 22-11192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COREY HOWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
MARSHA NICHOLS, ARNP, Well Path Care and GARY ENGLISH, AFA Security
Nichols v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05384
Plaintiff:
Marsha Nichols
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matthew Faison, Jr. v. Global Experts Outsourcing, et al
as 21-13710
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW L. FAISON, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
GLOBAL EXPERTS OUTSOURCING, GEO, CHARLES MAIORARIA, ANDRES MOLINA and others
Matthew Faison, Jr. v. Global Experts Outsourcing, et al
as 21-12585
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAESTRO MATTHEW FAISON, a.k.a. Matthew James Faison, a.k.a. Leo Jackson
Defendant / Appellee:
GLOBAL EXPERTS OUTSOURCING, GEO, CHARLES MAIORARIA, ANDRES MOLINA and others
Matthew Levi Faison, Jr. v. Global Experts Outsourcing, et al
as 21-11890
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAESTRO MATTHEW FAISON
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDRES MOLINA, MARSHA NICHOLS, GLOBAL EXPERTS OUTSOURCING, GEO and others
HOWELL v. NICHOLS et al
as 3:2021cv00110
Defendant:
Well Path Care, Marsha Nichols, Gary English and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. Nichols et al
as 3:2021cv00005
Defendant:
Well Path Care, Marsha Nichols, Gary English and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FAISON v. GLOBAL EXPERTS OUTSOURCING et al
as 3:2020cv05828
Defendant:
ANDRES MOLINA, MARSHA NICHOLS, CHARLES MAIORARIA and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW LEVI FAISON, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOOD v. NICHOLS et al
as 3:2020cv05492
Defendant:
CHARLES MAIORANA, MARSHA NICHOLS and G SEMPLE
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH G WOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
