Cases 1 - 8 of 8
LG Display America, Inc., et al v. USDC-CASF
as 12-70474
:
In re: LG DISPLAY AMERICA, INC., LG DISPLAY CO., LTD., AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and others
Petitioner:
LG DISPLAY AMERICA, INC., LG DISPLAY CO., LTD., AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
GLADYS BAKER, SCOTT BEALL, CHRISTOPHER BESSETTE and others
Anthony Cardinale, et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al
as 11-80102
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
ANTHONY CARDINALE, MICHAEL CHEK, DONNA JEANNE FLANAGAN and others
Defendant - Respondent:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. and others
Robert Kerson, et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al
as 10-80089
Plaintiff - Respondent:
ROBERT KERSON, FREDERICK ROZO, MICHAEL FRANCIS AYERS and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Robert Kerson, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
as 10-80087
Plaintiff - Respondent:
ROBERT KERSON, FREDERICK ROZO, MICHAEL FRANCIS AYERS and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
LG DISPLAY CO., LTD., LG DISPLAY AMERICA, INC., AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and others
Wiebe et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al
as 3:2007cv05332
Plaintiff:
Travis Wiebe, Travis Wiebe, Travis Wiebe and others
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Sandisk Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Wiebe et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al
as 4:2007cv05332
Plaintiff:
Travis Wiebe, Travis Wiebe, Travis Wiebe and others
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Sandisk Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Mulvey et al v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv02937
Plaintiff:
Martha Mulvey
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Mulvey v Au Optronics Corp., et al.
as 0:2007cv01425
Plaintiff:
Martha Mulvey, Martha Mulvey, Martha Mulvey and others
Defendant:
Au Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
