Cases 1 - 10 of 10
WEBSTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv17896
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WEBSTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WEBSTER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01713
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WEBSTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sadwick v. The City Of Rochester et al
as 6:2021cv06730
Plaintiff:
Alyssa Sadwick
Defendant:
The City Of Rochester, Geoffrey Quinn, Tyler Couch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WEBSTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv62342
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WEBSTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WEBSTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv37238
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WEBSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WEBSTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv01495
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WEBSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lawhorn v. Algarin et al
as 6:2016cv06226
Plaintiff:
Tyrell M. Lawhorn
Defendant:
Samuel Algarin, Alexis Bermudez, Andrew Bostick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Matthew Webster
as 15-1294
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MATTHEW WEBSTER
USA v. Cornelius Paxton, et al
as 14-2913
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
CORNELIUS PAXTON, also known as Diamond, also known as D, RANDY WALKER, RANDY PAXTON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
