Cases 21 - 30 of 254
United States v. Barnes
as 23-3031
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MAURICE LASHAWN BARNES
Harris v. Sandoval
as 23-1017
Petitioner / Appellant:
MAURICE E. HARRIS
Respondent / Appellee:
STEPHANIE SANDOVAL, Warden, CSP
Barclay v. Choate
as 1:2022cv03323
Petitioner:
Maurice Lamar Barclay
Respondent:
J. Choate and Choate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Teague v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2022cv00362
Plaintiff:
Maurice D. Teague
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
United States v. Farris
as 22-1412
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MAURICE FARRIS
Ford v. Forde et al
as 1:2022cv02682
Plaintiff:
Brandon Maurice Ford
Defendant:
Brian Forde, Elias Diggins, Denver Sheriffs Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2022cv01719
Petitioner:
Maurice E. Harris
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Defendant:
Dean Williams and Stephanie Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barclay v. Choate et al
as 1:2022cv01472
Petitioner:
Maurice Barclay
Respondent:
J. Choate, John Fabbricator, Mathew T. Albene and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cline v. ServiceSource International, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01464
Plaintiff:
Maurice Cline
Defendant:
ServiceSource International, Inc., Andrew M. Baker, Jane Okun Bomba and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 10 Securities Exchange Act
Lindsey v. Crow
as 4:2022cv00233
Petitioner:
Brian M. Lindsey, Brian M Lindsey, Brian Maurice Lindsey and others
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
