Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Johnson v. Sex Offender Registration et al
as 5:2014cv00525
Petitioner:
Maurice M Johnson
Respondent:
Sex Offender Registration and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Pattion et al
as 5:2014cv00528
Plaintiff:
Maurice M Johnson
Defendant:
Robert Pattion and Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Oklahoma County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2014cv00496
Petitioner:
Maurice M Johnson
Respondent:
Oklahoma County Sheriff's Department and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2013cv01363
Plaintiff:
Maurice Ray Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Becknell v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2013cv00473
Plaintiff:
Tony Maurice Becknell, Jr
Defendant:
City of Tulsa , Jeff Henderson , Ronald Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wiesendanger v. Mitchell et al
as 5:2013cv00761
Plaintiff:
Maurice Wiesendanger
Defendant:
Ida K Mitchell and FAF Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Cleveland v. Martin et al
as 4:2013cv00375
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cleveland
Defendant:
Terry Martin, Maurice Warrior, Glenn Waldon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cleveland v. Martin et al
as 5:2013cv00562
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cleveland
Defendant:
Terry Martin, Maurice Warrior, Glenn Waldon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2013cv00210
Plaintiff:
Mack Maurice Harmon, Jr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv01053
Plaintiff:
Maurice Ray Smith
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
